查看完整版本: 望远镜大排名

siqingtan 2008-8-16 21:58

望远镜大排名

反射镜jFf4^ c f,ck)L
1: 不推荐 ($300 and less) 4xN g+@{gwK
Tasco (C/j!rJ'v#BK
Bushnell/Bausch & Lomb
FZ!}zx(v Galileo (Home Shopping Network)  Yi5]1x*aIV1x
Other shopping channel, department store telescopes, etc 2QRT{R] `R
Telescopes found in "closeout" type catalogs 1eN,[d_;krd
Anything that says "XXXXX by Meade"  ` J@q-^#k(pY?eR
At least 95% of telescopes on ebay Ww?S Z!QX tT-Gta

KD+cqw H9Q
8Y%PX/X3F,BZa`)L 2: 有保留地推荐 ($300-$600) @J9zo,{O*T+m3q*n
Meade DS/EC Series (2-)  KgD:Nw$HjN W5] K
Bushnell Voyager Dobsonians (Note: Dobsonians only) 7mu)YHuRm J
Older Coulters with blue tubes J%fvY*ZZ
Old 1980s vintage Celestrons with the word "Comet" in them l!LQg X6m
Celestron C150HD,
/?.\ H z"v^j s/V G8N and NexStar 114 hybrid Newtonians (2+)
-? Mi6`'C Celestron NexStar 114GT (Hybrid, 2+)
x5D$u1J-rb&B ^:_[0j Edmund AstroscanQFc _{/{2p}'_
!?n*EdG%P^x
[[i] 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-8-16 22:00 编辑 [/i]]

siqingtan 2008-8-16 22:00

3: 推荐 ($250-$1500)jiBk`e5Wqw C4u~
Most Celestrons 8ib)I*]8h6T'Ok"Ll
Meade Starfinders (watch out for #77 2" plastic focuser) PB(s5z-bnhv
Most older Meades, 6" and larger (#628, #645, #826, #6600, #8800, etc) (3+)
H:j.[S!ck#By Meade 4500 (Avoid "similar" versions with .965" eyepieces)
:U-ID~L6J Most old Edmunds (red-tubed models preferable to white-tubed ones) WU j0~*d%_G;Q
Old Criterion Dynascopes (6", 8", check to see that RA drive works)
m7O#gn.f?7MI Orion XT and Sky View Deluxe models
$lN:n D.f oaU Older Orion Dobs (DSE, etc) k#Gb!C%rH*O
Discovery
0X-\,MRWE2?'YZo Coulter/Odyssey/Murnaghan scopes with red tubes (3-)
;i Rft }A7u Old Junos (3+) VL6gh"@S2b
Sovietski/TAL
Dl6[ c@ z Stargazer Steve (3-) (kit)%Dz|[1_i
Orion (UK) (3+) (unavailable in US)
| _z!@5c pNS
/fS;w-L!`rP1t 4:高度推荐 ($500-$3000)
FPdQ] DGM (4+)4D$|)M&W~My?
Parks "zpgB1QA
Most old Cave Astrolasgh+z$F0zE
Old Meade Research Grade Reflectors (8", 10", 12.5") (4+)
v].nl-gf Tectron p!a._'xTI#n2R
Sky Designs J P;WC~9xu/[,w
Old Starliners
4O+NG)@:zMQc Most Vixens s1k7e@4ci,p*zLo}
/X twk)EC`G
5: 强烈推荐 ($1500-$20000+) [ybB*X Ty.aF9l;d~
JMI NGT (12.5", 18")u0K+Hs|&W
Mag 1 Instruments Portaballs :c Bv(yO
Obsession rd'N R/r1m'u
Starmaster 3_"q k!kAsm
Starsplitter
~7P1y|s)iL1uE Takahashi ;d.?RLm bI*r
Optical Guidance Systems
{ vBP2H!B Parallax
0m4aEvk R sK"z 0||#Jo&v3ZL)Q
[[i] 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-8-16 22:04 编辑 [/i]]

siqingtan 2008-8-16 22:05

折射镜
%g%E,`,V;nm 1: 不推荐 ($300 and under)
t"s1e;u+r`&},W9~ Tasco, Bushnell, Jason, Simmons, Edu-Science, etc etc
9`2O.n`5Y)H'N#A-R;x5^j Anything that says "XXXXX by Meade" %}}"a8GW%CjM*j
Galileo (Home Shopping Network) Zs1g+pE
Other department store refractors, Shopping Channel, etc telescopes Telescopes found in "closeout" type catalogs l2f'xT:y Q2if:g
At least 95% of telescopes on ebay 5B#sG+|TW5V"h
&A:c/q/Apwa
  2: 有保留地推荐 ($300-$600)
e WY0z+u9F z Meade DS/EC Series (2-) k:Ht!}'ZQ
Meade ETX60-AT/70AT (2+) :i0m!onC:ss
Celestron NexStar 60GT and 80GT (2+)  xhW3W@Z x#A{3h
0w(T,v9v~G Z
3: 推荐 ($250-$700)
J pS reh4_eu Meade (#390/#395, 102ACHR, etc)
0f"V0P*g iDn Celestrons (older Vixen-based units are 3+ or 4) R Z0_!_8x8P,N.K
Stellarvue S%zhT?1T[4J N5c
Orion (90 mm and larger) r,F](C0EB2c
Unitron (3+)7D5JGG$Nq.N;R
Carton (not available in US) (3+) v*\9S Yf&[
Megrez 80 7O-_'tL*~/]h(fM
Skywatcher/Synta/Photon/Konus/Bresser/etc
$t)Hor)}4N\  
2_ p!h}@&`;PA\ `8n 4: 高度推荐 ($500-$6000) iTXC] A
Most Vixens (includes Orion/Vixen and Celestron/Vixen models)
?Wz4~U,`#D Meade ED Series (suspect QC prevents firm "4" rating) (4-)
.e}&q!N9O M TeleVue Ranger/Pronto 8]?\P$V)M)Y
Pentax (difficult to find in US)
;w't:y0TA}@ Borg/v6I-lGp.{8U$bx
Brandon (older 94 mm and 130 mm models are 4+)  
.{,L+Q3Q%W| ~Nuo
cX5P ^\ t9J'k 5: 强烈推荐 ($2000-$100000+)
P @)_R%p7X@K Astro-Physics
8@}2YZan Takahashi
Ur1?V7nu f*TeFR;S TMBack/William Yang Optics/APM 3O E;b+JA;Q
TeleVue
-TK.Gq r{-^.]'iE k TEC"{abEN#z
Nikon (not available in US)E _VSbT d
Zeiss
#Q"J Q(~R FI Pentax
/{ yUNi7P\9TV
/tec};]j,U`!d+S [[i] 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-8-16 22:20 编辑 [/i]]

siqingtan 2008-8-16 22:09

折反射镜
o3j/q| N&Q O6w 1: 不推荐 ($300 and less) rF jtIS9f
Old Bausch & Lomb Schmidt Cassegrains }!R:UM&V)e/q b`
Old Dynamax/Criterions (ah ET5[V5Vs
Anything that looks as if it might have started life somewhere else as a telephoto lens  
!`ol$To#a8N x
LQe6@#SK!s 2: 有保留地推荐 ($300-$1000)
JQ}M{+z Old Meade 2045 4" SCTs
l\%A*u;}%Z8u Old Meade MTS-SN6/ MTS-SN8 Schmidt Newtonians V7XU8cVot5s v
Old Celestron C-10 SCTs
b0R8]"o P)c Celestron C90/G3
K'h!j!Zb Mo)d Meade ETX 90, ETX 125 (QC varies widely, early 125s were
k2n{P]-y3H&Cb trouble-prone) (2+) t1HLO SuQ
Celestron NexStar 4 Maksutov (2+)  
6w%uJ/jW p cj nt'[DG1E7a3Z
3: 推荐 ($1000-$3000)
:p9\M?]C Meade LX10, LX50, LX200 $x:zR*ZDj A
Older Meade 2080, 2010 units (LX3, LX6, LX100) (3-) w/NW+wUa
Celestron SCTs (5", 8", 11", 14", includes NexStar 5 and NexStar 8)
+a-UqZ |/]+^8x Orion StarMax Maksutovs  
2`b [{ p I2H +l.u!Y*`8Hg ULwM3~
4: 高度推荐 ($1000-$3000) v5X:@kmq4h
Intes/ Orion Argonaut (some pre-1998 units have mechanical problems) u0H tZI7N
STF
cg1h&Mv Celestron C 9.25 0i$G{ZbS
Meade 7" Maksutov (4-) ]0}q7nq#`0s {
Old 4" and 6" Quantums  
1S#Wy;d\
&v~z MU(zBC7d#R 5: 强烈推荐 ($3000-$12000)
C-I/C%BKj K Takahashi SCT225
'["Hy6s$dY TEC2505]D/g m"S6`OQ$l$F
Astro-Physics Maksutovs (Extremely rare and NA as of this writing) *K,?xB-R%na
Questar 3.5/7|+B+W2U&l
Ceravolo
n9p1ZA g|Em~
0@+v{%X7vK (by Ed Ting, 引自 [url=http://www.scopereviews.com/]www.scopereviews.com[/url] ) rO*[3k%G*F
isf1v W[H3SZ
[[i] 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-8-16 22:20 编辑 [/i]]

fancysky 2008-8-16 22:26

WO地位和高桥,AP一样了啊。txu K6k

wW9M5k+o Q nm [[i] 本帖最后由 fancysky 于 2008-8-16 22:30 编辑 [/i]]

siqingtan 2008-8-16 22:44

WO沾了TMB的光bbbb32

redfox_pd 2008-8-16 22:50

有些地方说得太含糊,说了跟没说似的。

caoking988 2008-8-16 22:53

先进来找找有没有自己的器材
DV/`oF] B_ T.U0k(_ bbbb67

月下晒太阳 2008-8-17 04:43

归根到底还是米的问题…
o;Sp*y)OZ%['b 有米,谁不想烧?T T

denebman 2008-8-17 10:24

这个排名应该是Ed Ting很久以前搞的,置于WO的镜子,放在“有保留推荐”一栏里更加恰当。

Alone狼 2008-8-17 14:29

呵呵 ..+e#D_,s.^p
看过了 好早以前就看过了\+O \(](W
wo 不好 破烂  和顶级没法比 特别是采用了台湾产镜头的
l a5S5f+g 当然了 tmb头的还是很不错的

美丽的天文 2008-8-18 12:39

C9.25看来还是C家的一枝独秀。

小小俊 2008-8-18 14:46

升级就搞个C9.25!

wbhifi 2008-8-19 06:49

[quote]原帖由 [i]Alone狼[/i] 于 2008-8-17 14:29 发表 [url=http://www.astroview.com.cn/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=67153&ptid=6755][img]http://www.astroview.com.cn/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
/{|+K2u*Y0n3V,E'pvO/^ 呵呵 ..V.Q.K6k7I;Vt0x2qj)r
看过了 好早以前就看过了:a9`r'i;n&^1E~b0v
wo 不好 破烂  和顶级没法比 特别是采用了台湾产镜头的
4F-?L9myZ-],X;|a 当然了 tmb头的还是很不错的 [/quote]
h?8FH.gW/u
([(h"Y5k-e^aY5xm:` 狼对WO的镜子真是没有信心啊bbbb15, 不过客观一点说, WO有的镜子还是不错的, 比如FLT132。

蠕动 2008-8-19 08:33

WO的镜子看来还是上大的比较保险,要不镜头太让人 CONFUSION了

lv-zz 2008-8-31 20:10

写的很清晰
)g;[%y3|"|-g 写了哈
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 望远镜大排名