查看完整版本: BADDER MARK V快到了,和TV双目对比即将上演,微辣比对微微辣

BADDER MARK V快到了,和TV双目对比即将上演,微辣比对微微辣

BAADER MARK V快到了,和TV双目对比即将上演,微辣比对微微辣bHX8y6O9Q [q#J
先占个坑!bbbb4

派兄，你还有多少毒品没到，先通报一下让我们有个心理准备bbbb37

还有一个派拉蒙bbbb74

[quote]原帖由 [i]我爱祖祖[/i] 于 2008-8-21 09:24 发表 [url=http://www.astroview.com.cn/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=67842&ptid=6840][img]http://www.astroview.com.cn/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
winW|7tF"D 还有一个派拉蒙bbbb74 [/quote]
4F |-r N-H u8{u/X$mp
这个可是个重量级的大家伙啦aIQ7o$Z0Y
bbbb24

不错，等着看。以后有闲钱了也要上个双目，现在还不成。

[quote]原帖由 [i]我爱祖祖[/i] 于 2008-8-21 09:24 发表 [url=http://www.astroview.com.cn/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=67842&ptid=6840][img]http://www.astroview.com.cn/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
!z d.F&Z9^:E 还有一个派拉蒙bbbb744" /> [/quote]
@)V`F.jB7S_ *yyu}-|y
派兄准备用派拉蒙架什么镜子？PENTAX125sdp？bbbb0

肯定是180了，不然要那么大个头的赤道仪干甚么

回复 7# 的帖子

大错特错！180这样的小儿科不值得上派拉蒙啊！发挥一下想象力吧！bbbb39

[quote]原帖由 [i]lxyfuzz[/i] 于 2008-8-21 11:04 发表 [url=http://www.astroview.com.cn/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=67886&ptid=6840][img]http://www.astroview.com.cn/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]0wq\cd8y+p_G
大错特错！180这样的小儿科不值得上派拉蒙啊！发挥一下想象力吧！bbbb399" /> [/quote]
dTt8n4?#oi 那就是一米RC了！bbbb10

回复 9# 的帖子

这个想象有点过了，1米RC我看得用特大号派拉蒙了！

派拉蒙？难道是自己直接住在一米镜子上面…

我想肯定是被刘兄放MK的毒给放多了，准备进个10“或者12.5”的马卡bbbb97

LZ， Mark V除了clear aperture大一些以外， 估计在素质上的优势是很难看出来的 bbbb388" /> ， 至少我觉得TV 双目已经足够好了， 在我这里我是看不出任何区别。
ERku5GS7AK2D%I*X~ Q*^9?D [n"Sk7Yb
但CA大， 对我来说却很有意义 bb54

回复 1# 的帖子

看来AP配件有存货的话效率蛮快的,祝贺派兄~~

我不是很喜欢TV双目松松跨跨的感觉,双目就像是棱镜天顶,三大品牌之间的区别不会很大.

做工AP的确很扎实， bbbb67 ， 比Denk II和TV都好半个档次。

CN上一哥们 April 2008 through Starizona订得这个家伙到了,不知派兄是不是也快了bbbb39
Ha|7P4W}nG [attach]12974[/attach]
@xLkn^*Z1y} Z [attach]12975[/attach]
J4`3dK-\:e&B,p
EO$WMtJ [[i] 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-8-26 21:13 编辑 [/i]]

把这些东西都排个队，派喊一二一，让它们围着转:lol

我看到了华硕主板。。。

看到最新的一些说明,在月球和行星之外不推荐用巴罗,用最广角目镜即可,还有一些双目使用的特点:lol
&D#Q#PE4Fo I'd be very interested in learning which eyepieces others have found to be3L5it)|yL;GvF
> the best. Roland, what is the theory behind binoviewer quality viewing?
!V)lm3O1rl Y f;OF
%C6~(R_ },l&L :WcOKcUrlbl
E'_#N_p7N"q5w'@F
Field stop size has no bearing on Binoviewing. Any high quality eyepiece will d/@mT:m-v[
work well. The binoviewer is limited to 125" eyepieces and will cover anyg a[2`k(S
eyepiece of that size.m m yalQ
9U,},Bq L
If you want high power for Lunar/planetary, then do most of the magnificationum
[\jz,b
ahead of the bino. Why magnify the defects of almost 5 inches of prism path
w&\|%q Y uq9G length? The defects in the Baader bino are small but not zero. A Barlow ahead
{+E9x_/h-j$MN of the Bino will reduce the power needed at the eyepiece end. Remember, a 25mm
x/t0t*T,^0T \ eyepiece will magnify the image along with all the defects of the prism by
;g}%k8qfl/FV3qt x 10x. A 5mm eyepiece will magnify the image plus prism defects by 50x - 5 times
p+Xx$g$K8B1S more than the 25mm eyepiece. If you put a 3x barlow ahead of the Bino, then you
d`)l2R.k$S_i:JP only have to magnify the image at the eyepiece end by 16 times to get theh;}fj!N9in'K
same power that the 5mm, 50x eyepiece gave you without the Barlow. The view will
Y0HAMno_ be clearer and cleaner, and on top of that, there will be more chance thatu?
p;^6t7Z-e"f
your eyes can merge the two channels. N j\\&}G~@
(?9@)J9o(^5rU
For low power viewing, of course the Barlow is not needed at all, and you
$P&c,Kh/o Fs'nG want to use the widest eyepiece that you have.
@3^ Y*g!wWwO
8?u)KJ a4{;}$K/f9xc
d Roland&kM0X"iR9m
X X&Uy)L1rZ$a
[[i] 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-8-29 23:49 编辑 [/i]]

嘿嘿 占个位置 :lol :lol