|
钻石会员
 
|
37#
大 中
小 发表于 2008-4-21 16:51 只看该作者
关于AP和高桥赤道仪的对比，下边说的很有意思，最主要就一句话，前者可以用更低的价格获得更大的载重，就是等的时间长；后者型号更多，并且容易买到，在低载重市场占有很大优势 
4 o# z: L2 v( h4 Z天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛Greg, www.astroview.com.cn# X6 r$ T9 A5 r; L
>I may have been comparing apples to oranges. I was thinking more
! a) C9 w1 @2 L' d) ^% V天文论坛,天文,望远镜,天文望远镜,apo,ed,televue,tv,tmb,高桥,ap,tec,望远镜评测，望远镜测评,双筒望远镜，天顶，目镜，望远镜配件，赤道仪along the lines of the AP1200 and AP3600.
8 N9 O/ Y- @% ~* i! Iwww.astroview.com.cn
2 S- n" e& {6 ~; h6 i/ o" ?AP1200GTO: <$10K approx. 140 lbs load
* a) A% s( J$ @8 t( {国内专业的天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛，致力于如高桥、televue、tmb、ap、tec等顶级望远镜和附属器材TAK EM2500: $55K 155 lbs load 天文论坛,天文,望远镜,天文望远镜,apo,ed,televue,tv,tmb,高桥,ap,tec,望远镜评测，望远镜测评,双筒望远镜，天顶，目镜，望远镜配件，赤道仪' B3 V3 E& q5 e, B: p# @* c: N
www.astroview.com.cn0 x& F. O8 v5 h! K4 U
AP3600: <$21K approx.
; t* z: B: }/ ]9 `" bwww.astroview.com.cnTAK EM3500: $99K 350 lbs load
$ e ]) _. ?2 z& ~; A4 o国内专业的天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛，致力于如高桥、televue、tmb、ap、tec等顶级望远镜和附属器材
1 z% g$ l3 O' n2 \" U: }- Uwww.astroview.com.cnI agree that the other TAK mounts are competitive price-wise with 天文论坛,天文,望远镜,天文望远镜,apo,ed,televue,tv,tmb,高桥,ap,tec,望远镜评测，望远镜测评,双筒望远镜，天顶，目镜，望远镜配件，赤道仪1 g( F, S5 R1 j. ?, F p9 y
AP but as your post seems to allude, I'm not sure how easy they are
, V, D: K9 T( {; ?6 ~& L天文论坛,天文,望远镜,天文望远镜,apo,ed,televue,tv,tmb,高桥,ap,tec,望远镜评测，望远镜测评,双筒望远镜，天顶，目镜，望远镜配件，赤道仪to use in the field. I also don't know what the Observatory
1 W2 y; B1 w. I/ L( P天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛designation of the EM2500 and E3500 does to price and performance.
0 C* o5 S; Z; x8 x8 g3 C天文家园欢迎您！When Markus posted his email, the EM3500 came to mind.
9 _! l* E4 K5 E. w8 owww.astroview.com.cn天文家园欢迎您！8 I) T9 l* O# ^2 z, p& u+ `$ D' [$ |
SIncerely, 天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛8 _' U' p& F" o/ i* E* z V
Greg www.astroview.com.cn9 X/ h0 a% Y, v3 A# |1 Q
On Dec 19, 2007, at 23:16, gnowellsct wrote: 天文家园欢迎您！# s0 d3 K4 E- N: i2 U% A1 s
天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛( S* x8 y/ h1 U* s
> Well to give them their due the Tak mounts are pretty portable in the 天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛" A; A& j9 f+ y- ~0 K3 ?
> classes comparable to the Mach1, 900 and 1200. And they're not $100k. 天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛0 ]( ]& d: U6 ~, j2 V3 Y
> I'm not sure why one would go for a Tak mount over an AP, but people 天文论坛,天文,望远镜,天文望远镜,apo,ed,televue,tv,tmb,高桥,ap,tec,望远镜评测，望远镜测评,双筒望远镜，天顶，目镜，望远镜配件，赤道仪7 B; }; t8 L, f" C& {' e
> do it and not only live to tell the tale, they actually like them.
" o0 G Y. b d, a天文家园欢迎您！> The Tak group is very clannish however. I think part of the
0 B% D) L: q$ g7 |: q. G5 e6 h天文论坛,天文,望远镜,天文望远镜,apo,ed,televue,tv,tmb,高桥,ap,tec,望远镜评测，望远镜测评,双筒望远镜，天顶，目镜，望远镜配件，赤道仪> less-clannish thing going on over here is that the shortage of AP
( ]- Y, p! c4 H) j! n8 a天文家园欢迎您！> optics makes for a heterogeneous bunch of people who are putting all 7 x( b- L( `& C) r. i" }
> kinds of different optics on AP mounts. By contrast my hunch (no 天文望远镜器材评测和交流论坛% _. ^% T2 i; r8 Y7 {1 t2 s7 T
> data) is that most Tak mounts are carrying Tak optics. I expect they
# F+ [) u( Q2 @8 Q1 U9 [> have a smaller market share (in mounts) than AP.
* [9 p' t3 a& ?+ g! \www.astroview.com.cn
- S0 H/ _8 k4 J0 [; c. E* L[ 本帖最后由 siqingtan 于 2008-4-21 16:54 编辑 ]
|
